Death is a change in form-collaborative prompt
Change is Constant Even After We Are Dead
Riding waves and particle theories into physical form
One person’s journey through adolescence, adulthood, and into the afterlife with an ever-changing view equating to a perceptual understanding of reality itself, waves and particles colliding self and the collective whole. Left adhering to dogmatic scribes or tossing all existence out windows of time and space — remaining open to new possibilities and continuous shape-shifting self-realizing nothingness — divergent birthing forms.
We believe orange to be round and of the color it is named, but what if another sees it as green or something different in its entirety? How would we know the difference but trust interpretation to be blue? Measured not by the iris’ filtering of trusted, visible wave-like patterning existence but by self-interpretation of physical form and entangled particles making whole.
The learned illnesses of the world trapping us with the debilitating credo, dependent on another, forgotten divine presence of self-healing organism. Drifting a bit to reach a point, redirecting thoughts and quantum tunneling of photons into an interwoven web of possibility, we arrive at a constant even after death.
Conscious merging photons collide with particles left floating amidst the sea of blue, creating new biological particles acting as couriers with messages from ancestral bodies. Given birth to limited belief, a fusion of past-particles handed down by the mommas and papas, until one moves beyond physical form. OBE (Outer Body Experience), NDE (Near Death Experience), or astral traveling to uncharted territories, maybe a hallucinogen — what if this is reality?
Separating waves and particles, allowing viewer self-experiential quantum entanglement — mechanics of an observer without preconceived notions — physical reality altered by merely wishing something to be. Closely the scientists approach absolute, falling short of what may be bat-shit crazy is the tune we sing pulling every hair, yet nudging closer are the thoughts measured even after clinical death declaration.
Okay, Okay, I digress.
From the time we are born to supposed death, we are an ever-changing entity with new physical shape, cellular reconstruction, and psychological understandings rewriting our course. A completely new person within a year, every cell, every particle replaced by newly developed molecular milieu, infused with ingested beliefs that a Big Mac will be the death of us or inserted memory chip from outdated Texas Instruments.
Evidence, they want evidence!
Researchers are recording brainwave activity in the depths of a cranial corpse hours past declared body expiration. Distantly reaching beyond and further seeking answers of its remains. In another room, scientists measuring the weight of souls exiting the physical world quantified and recorded tipping scales on weights and measures of a soul.
Decays written law for all physical forms, death as certain as the sun rising in the morn, gradually deteriorating until that final day — soul’s fleeting leap, returning to whence it came, but returning to our understanding of what color is orange? Back into the cosmic soup of a gazillion particles, photons are acting like particles, fusing as one until human shape takes form invisible to tangible collective field and configuration.
From the dust we came to the dust we return, physical shape molded by greater hands, true essence remains. Infinite particles are admeasuring colliders replicating speeds, extending variance of self and collective whole, as holy as one.
~ Ani Po
What more this changing of form — birth to death — pure energetic being molded into flesh? How does one quantify the possibility of an ever-changing form of reality? We look to scientists to record events, such as OBE’s, NDE’s and astral travels.
While sparring with his partner, a young man shifts into spirit form while observing his body, sparring another, knowing every move about to happen before it happened, a documented case such as thousands of others, recorded for scientific data. Left empty, speculated stories, or as Frank Ontario discusses the illusion or hallucination of reality, one is left to believe in a fabricated tale of what happened in altered states of consciousness.
Another story of a young lady sliding off the hood of a traveling bus, losing consciousness while being thrown across the intersection. With no recall of what had happened or how long she was unconscious, she only remembered returning to the source of all everything. Again, as Frank points out, NDE’s potential to be another form of hallucination, we are left unsatisfied as to what may truly exist.
What of the yogis practicing astral travel or a mystical order teaching Neophytes how to access Akashic records? Are they all making up hallucinatory fabricated stories? Or is their validity in numbers when others across the globe confirm their presence and complete conversation in detail?
Scientists have stepped closer into the afterlife, documenting hours after a clinical death, brain activity in a small section of the brain.
Eventually decaying beyond measure, scientists are left wondering if the brain activity continues and for how long. Further studies to capture such detail.
Regarding Frank’s answer to hallucinatory creation of reality, Anil Seth discusses and parallels our brains’ hallucinations with reality. Further suggesting we alter our consciousness by removing any barriers of acceptance, altering a belief, in reality, thereby creating Utopian existence if we so choose.
Humans have the potentiality of crossing all barriers of time and space, but it cannot be recorded without having personal experiences. But aren’t these experiences merely hallucinations? So how can they be true? Thorsten Ritz discusses the possibility of quantum mechanics entangled with our existence, traveling from point A to point B, intertwining and influence the next intersecting points. Suggesting a possibility of human thought, even flesh, being simultaneously in multiple places at one time, offering .
What about past lives? Reincarnation? Rebecca Romanelli chimes in on this topic.
Questions from Frank Ontario and answers from author
- Your long preamble while being beautifully written and poetically dreamlike seems superfluous to the topic at hand — evident in your comment to as “I digress”.
Q: Is this an unconscious desire on your part to hijack emotions of readers to your point of view?
Maybe So Frank. I would like to think of it as teasing the readers into making up their own minds, cautioning them not to believe everything they read.
2. “In another room, scientists measuring the weight of souls exiting the physical world quantified and recorded tipping scales on weights and measures of a soul.”
Q: If you’re referring to the 21 grams experiment in 1907 — only 1 of 6 subjects were registered as having lost that weight during the death process. Scientists have thoroughly discredited the results of this experiment on many levels: not enough people in the sample, the other people who died — the equipment was said not to be working or was not calibrated correctly. The experiment did not rise to being worthy of being replicated.
While this experiment performed by Duncan Macdougall was debunked by the scientific community, with no credible findings, it still raises questions for me personally as to a possibility with more potential of findings, returning to what if? What if there was a way of measuring that missing aspect of the soul? Or is it left for metaphysics and philosophers to ponder existence through weights and measures of spirit? Can they be quantified or are they just an invisible presence open to whomever chooses to open that gateway into unknown possibility?
3. The Video you use as a source is a report of Near Death Experience(s) of NDEs. NDEs are “returns” from a yet undefined state that may or may not have to do with death per se. Since people have returned from what has been called “After Death” experiences they have not stayed dead. Technically NDEs are different than the afterlife. NDEs suggest temporary death states, therefore — since they are not permanent they may not be considered “Afterlife”. More research that can be replicated needs to be performed before a tentative conclusion can be ascertained.
Q: How is the Video “definitive replicated evidence suggesting Life After Death?
If a sentient being dies and decomposes, is there any scientific proof they died? Your question sparks more questions for me, as I observe the greater whole of humanity. Meaning this video tips on the idea of when we actually die with inclusivity, in my opinion, determining when a person dies. We do not have the capability at this time, to record the consciousness passing over the bridge of a formal death.
Thank you Diana C. for this opportunity to share thoughts with a fellow writer, collaborate and facilitate a possibility of losing our minds — deliberately. Thank you Frank Ontario for working along side and allowing me to jot as necessary.
Here is Frank Ontario’s prompted piece regarding Death as a final ending, please give it your time.
